Sunday, August 30, 2015

BEWARE

Dear member, 

We understand that members are receiving letter from Mr Rajiv Bansal, Chartered Accountant, A-308, LGF Defence Colony, New Delhi claiming to represent the management of  M/s Durga Builders (P) Ltd. The said communication has requested the members to send to him information in a proforma alongwith documents in original/ self certified within 21 days failing with the said communication threatened the members to ignore their claim to the plot.

We are seeking legal advice in the matter. In the meanwhile we advise our members "NOT TO SHARE ANY INFORMATION TO ANY PERSON" without consultation with the Forum. We will be informing the members through the website  about action taken by us in the matter before the said period of three weeks.

Please log-on this blogger regularly for latest developments in the case.

Thanks & regards,

RAKESH VERMA

Secretary

Tuesday, July 21, 2015

Orders dated 15.07.2015

Dear member, 

Orders passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India on 15.07.2015 is as under :-


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA 
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 
I.A. NO.44 OF 2013 AND I.A. NO. 1 OF 2015
 IN 
WRIT PETITION (C ) NO. 113 OF 1996 

OKHLA ENCLAVE JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE ...PETITIONER VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS I.A. NO. 9 IN W.P. (C ) NO. 792 OF 1996 I.A. NOS. 8-9, CRL. M.P. NO./2010 IN I.A. NO. 8, I.A. NOS. 10, 13-24, I.A. NOS.1-170 AND I.A. NO. 1 IN I.A. NO.58 IN I.A. NOS. 8 AND 9 IN W.P. (C ) NO. 876 OF 1996. W.P. (C ) NO. 1037 OF 2014 I.A. NO.1/2015 IN W.P. (C ) NO.2 OF 2015 I.A. NO.2/2015 IN W.P. (C ) NO.3 OF 2015 I.A. NO.1/2015 IN W.P. (C ) NO.6 OF 2015 W.P. (C ) NO.27 OF 2015 I.A. NOS.1-4 IN W.P. (C ) NO.1064 OF 2014 I.A. NO.11-12/2007 IN W.P. (C ) NO.477 OF 1996 W.P.(C) No. 122 OF 2015

O R D E R 

I.A. NO.13 OF 2014 
Mr. V. Giri, learned senior counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application in order to move the appropriate forum. The prayer is allowed. I.A. No.13, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 

We have heard learned counsel for all the parties including the learned counsel appearing in the writ petitions as also in the other interlocutory applications.

At the very outset, we are not inclined to entertain these writ petitions and interlocutory applications, except Interlocutory Application NOs.8 and 9 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.876 of 1996, and to adjudicate their title in respect of the area where they alleged to have been in occupation. Those writ petitions and interlocutory applications are hereby dismissed.

However, the writ petitioners and the other petitioners who have filed interlocutory applications are given liberty to move the appropriate forum by filing suits/other proceedings for adjudication of their title and possession.

The interim order, if any, passed in these writ petitions and interlocutory applications shall continue to be in force for a period of three months so that they may file applications before the Court where suits or proceedings that may be filed and pray for interim relief.

It is made clear that while hearing the interlocutory applications or passing order, the Court concerned shall not be prejudiced by the orders passed 2 by this Court. We further direct that the suits or proceedings, if any, that may be filed by these persons shall be decided as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year.

So far as the interest of the petitioners in IA.Nos. 8 and 9 is concerned, having regard to the orders passed by this Court on 17.7,.2013, 10.7.2014 and 4.8.2014, before we finally adjudicate the matter, we direct the Director General (DG), Town and Country Planning to file a fresh affidavit giving the details of the land available, excluding the land alleged to have been occupied by the encroachers or persons claiming title and also under general category and to state how the persons who have been allotted as far back as in the year 1986 and thereafter shall be accommodated.

It has come from the Bar that it is the builder who is actually involved in the distribution of plots and also alleged to have been committed fraud by transferring the same plot to more than one persons. The builder is, therefore, directed to file an affidavit giving his explanation and also to state as to how the persons interested shall be accommodated in the land.

In so far as those interlocutory applications filed by the persons other than the alleged encroachers 3 or persons claiming title, they may, if so advised, move the High Court for redressal of the grievance.

Put up I.A. Nos. 8 and 9 in Writ Petition (Civil) No.876 of 1996 after six weeks.


S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A 
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

I.A.NO. 44/2013 AND I.A. NO. 1/2015 
in 
Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 113/1996 

OKHLA ENCLAVE JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE Petitioner(s) VERSUS U O I & ORS Respondent(s) (for directions and impleadment and office report) WITH I.A. No. 9 in W.P.(C) No. 792 of 1996 (For directions) I.A. NOS. 8-9, CRL.M.P. No......./2010 in I.A. No. 8, I.A. Nos. 10, 13-24, I.A. Nos. 1-170 and I.A. No. 1 in I.A. No. 58 in I.A. Nos. 8 and 9 in W.P.(C) No. 876 of 1996 (For permission and impleadment and directions and clarification and office report) W.P.(C) No. 1037/2014 (With appln. For stay) I.A. No. 1/2015 in W.P.(c) No. 2 of 2015 (For stay and office report) I.A. No.2/2015 in W.P.(C) No. 3/2015 (For stay and office report) I.A. No.1/2015 in W.P.(C) No. 6/2015 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) W.P.(C) No. 27/2015 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) I.A. Nos. 1-4 in W.P.(C) No. 1064/2014 (With appln.(s) for stay and appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and appln.(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and Office Report) I.A. Nos. 11-12/2007 in W.P.(C) No. 477/1996 (For directions and office report) W.P.(C) No. 122/2015 (With appln.(s) for stay and Office Report) 5 Date : 15/07/2015 These applications and writ petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.Y. EQBAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. NAGAPPAN

Amicus Curiae Mr. Raju Ramachandran,
Sr.Adv. For the appearing parties : Ms. Minakshi Vij,Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan,Adv. Ms. Sumita Hazarika,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Mishra, Adv. Mr. V. Sushant Gupta, Adv. For Mr. Mushtaq Ahmad,Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal,Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram,Adv. Ms. Monisha Handa, adv. Mr. Manan Kumar Mishra, Sr.Adv. Mr. Anjani Kumar Mishra,Adv. Ms. Anjkul Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. H.K. Puri Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain,Adv. Mr. Azim H. Laskar, Adv. Mr. Sachin Das, Adv. Mr. Abhijit Sengupta,Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha,Adv. Mr. Kishan Datta,Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan,Adv. Mr. Prem Malhotra,Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav,Adv. 6 Mr. T. V. George,Adv. Mr. V. Sivasubramanian,Adv. M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Adv. Mr. Ram Kishor Singh Yadav,Adv. Mr. H. K. Puri,Adv. Mr. P. Parmeswaran,Adv. Mr. Shahid Anwar, adv. Mr. Amit Pawan, adv. Mr. P.K. Dey, Adv. Mr. T.A. Khan, Adv. Mr. Kumar Parimal, Adv. Mr. B.V. Balram Das, Adv. Ms. Gunwant Dara, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra, Adv. Mr. E.C. Vidya Sagar, Adv. Mr. Pramod Kumar, Adv. Mr. G. Ramakrishna Prasad, Adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan, Adv. Mr. P.N. Puri, Adv. Mr. P.P. Kanwar, Adv. Mr. Ranbir Singh Yadav, Adv. Mr. S. Rajappa, Adv. Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Adv. Ms. Sumita Hazarika, Adv. Petitioner-in-person Dr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Arun K. Sinha, Adv. Mr. Bimal Roy Jad, Adv. Mr. Dinesh Chandra Pandey, Adv. 7 Mr. Sudarshan Rajan, Adv. Ms. Shriya Raj Chauhan, Adv. Mr. K.B. Sounder Rajan, Adv. Mr. Vikrant Yadav, Adv. Mr. M.C. Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Munawwar Naseem Adv. Mr. B.A. Khan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Piyush Sharma, Adv. Mr. B.A. Khan, Sr.Adv. Mr. P. Parmeswaran, Adv. Mr. B.A. Khan, Sr.Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Arup Banerjee, Adv. Mr. S. Ritam Khare, Adv. Mr. B.R. Jad, adv. Mr. P. Narasimhan, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shailendra Bhardwaj, Adv. Ms. Aroma S. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. Shekhar Kumar Adv. Mr. S.K. Verma, Adv. Mrs. Rani Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Subhash Sharma, Adv. Mr. K.N. Madhusoodhanan, Adv. Mr. T.G. Narayanan Nair, Adv. Mr. Soumyajit Pani, Adv. Mr. Rahul Bhandari, Adv. Mr. A.V. Manavalan, adv. Mr. Vinodh Kanna B., Adv. Mr. V. Sivasubramanian, Adv. Mr. Yashpal Dhingra, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. Ms. Jaspreet Gogia, Adv. 8 Ms. Jyotika Kalra, Adv. For M/s Khaitan & Co., Advs. Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, Adv. Ms. Puja Sharma, Adv. Ms. Vaishali Mittal, Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Nitin Bhardwaj, Adv. Mr. D.K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, adv. Mr. N.K. Verma, Adv. Mr. Shivam Garg, Adv. Mr. Rama Shankar, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. Mr. Anoop Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram, Adv. Ms. Susmita Lal, Adv. Mr. Apurb Lal, Adv. Mr. Ashesh Lal, Adv. Ms. Neha Garg, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. Ms. Preeti Singh, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Jain, Adv. Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv. Mr. Srisatya Mohanty, Adv. Ms. Priyanjali Singh, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. B.S. Maan, adv. Ms. Simita Maan, Adv. Mr. Hitesh Kumar Sharma, adv. Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy, Adv. Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Ekansh Agarwal, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Agarwal, Adv. 9 Ms. Anitha Shenoy, Adv. Mr. Merusagar Samantaray, Adv. Mr. Kishan Datta, Adv. Mr. Subramonium Prasad, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, Adv. Mr. D.C. Pandey, adv. Mr. Piyush Sharma, adv. Mr. U.P. Singh, Adv. Mr. V. Giri, Sr.Adv. Mr. Rahul Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Jay Kishor Singh, Adv. State of Haryana Mr. Anil Grover, AAG Ms. Nupur Singhal, adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, Adv. Mr. Satish Kapoor, Adv. Mr. Brijendra Singh, Adv. Mr. H.M. Singh, Adv. Mr. Anil Hooda, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ankit Gupta, Adv. Mr. Jitender Hooda, Adv. For Mr. R.K.S. Yadav, adv.

 UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

 O R D E R 

I.A. No.13 of 2014 is dismissed as withdrawn.

All the writ petitions and interlocutory applications except Interlocutory application Nos. 8 and 9 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 876 of 1996 are dismissed.

The interim order, if any, passed in these writ petitions and interlocutory applications shall continue to be in force for a period of three months.

Put up I.A. Nos. 8 and 9 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 876 of 1996 after six weeks. 

Our case is already stands adjudicated in our favour in the year 2008. Now, your forum is free to pursue its legal case before the Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in contempt petition.

Please log-on this blogger regularly for latest developments in the case.

Thanks & regards,

RAKESH VERMA

Secretary